Democrats in the House and Senate are pushing to repeal a law requiring a parent or guardian to be notified at least 48 hours in advance when a minor 17 or younger requests an abortion. Consent is not required as is the case in almost half of the states.
The video shown is from a previous report.
For parents who support the opinions, this is a ‘common sense’ approach to ensuring families are involved in the health care of a minor and even identifying children in abusive situations that need more help. Opponents say there is no point in delaying a minor’s constitutional right to choose their health care, a disruption that could have adverse effects.
The repeal arouses a sudden sense of urgency among supporters. The texan law prohibits most abortions after detection of cardiac activity – at about six weeks. And the United States Supreme Court will hear a challenge in December of a Mississippi Law which prohibits most abortions after 15 weeks.
RELATED: Motivated by Restrictive New Texas Abortion Law, Women’s Marches Sweep the Country
“There’s another dimension to it now …” said Rep. Anna Moeller, an Elgin Democrat and House repeal sponsor. “I expect Texan-style laws to apply to states close to us. We are already surrounded by states that have very strict laws on access to abortion. It will be this race to the bottom: who can be the toughest on abortion until the court steps in? “
Moeller said she talks to colleagues, tallies votes and tries to persuade moderate Democrats. Democratic Senator Elgie Sims of Chicago has similar legislation in the Senate, but he did not respond to a message seeking comment. If they can collect the votes, they have an ally ready to sign the law.
“I am in favor of repealing the ANP,” Democratic Governor JB Pritzker said last week. “I do not know if the legislature will address this issue during the two week veto session, but I have spoken on it since I was elected.”
The 1995 law, passed in the only legislative session in the past half-century in which Republicans controlled both the House and Senate and the governor’s office, did not come into effect until 2013, after years of legal challenges by the American Civil Liberties Union.
Since then, the number of underage abortions has fallen 38% to 1,092 in 2018, while overall abortions among Illinois residents have remained stable, according to health department statistics. Illinois Public. Numbers in both categories have fallen since the mid-1990s; overall, they fell 25% from a high of 49,131 in 1996, while underage abortions peaked at 4,853 in 1995 and a low of 1,003 in 2017, a decrease by 79%.
“It’s a very sensible law that actually transcends the issue of abortion,” said Amy Gehrke, executive director of Illinois Right to Life. “It has to do with the basic right of parents to be involved in their children’s health care decisions. Here in Illinois… underage girls can’t get their ears pierced, they can’t get their ears pierced. tattoo, they can’t go to a tanning bed, they can’t go on a school trip, they can’t even get an aspirin from the school nurse without their parents’ explicit consent. “
RELATED: ‘Jane Roe’ Daughter in Landmark Abortion Case Tells Her Story
Gehrke points out that many misinterpret Illinois law as requiring consent. It is simply a notification to a parent, grandparent or guardian. And it is the establishment that conducts the procedure, and not the minor, who must provide the opinion.
Out of 38 states requiring parental involvement in the decision to abort a minor, 21 require parental consent – in three of these, both parents must consent, according to the Guttmacher Institute.
If a girl finds herself in a family situation where informing her parents or other family members could harm her, she can go to a judge who will then decide if she is mature and emotionally healthy enough to decide for her. -same. This has happened 550 times since 2013, with a judge denying access to abortion once, according to Brigid Leahy, senior director of public policy for Planned Parenthood of Illinois.
Gehrke and other pro-notice activists argue that judicial circumvention allows a judge to identify minors who are abused or even victims of sex trafficking and provide them with the social services they need to get out of it. Their opponents argue that the judges are only there to decide the issue of abortion and have no implication in saving minors from betrayal.
Ed Yohnka, spokesperson for the ACLU, including Legal circumvention coordination project helps girls seeking legal intervention, said lawyers for the project have never known of a case where a child needs this type of rescue, but judges would intervene absolutely if necessary.
That’s reason enough to uphold the law, said Bob Gilligan, executive director of the Illinois Catholic Conference, which has been lobbying lawmakers to block the repeal since the end of the spring legislative session.
“If you limit this law, then what is there?” asked Gilligan. ” Nothing. Is this good public policy? ”
Copyright © 2021 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved.Source link