U.S. Supreme Court to hear Ted Cruz campaign finance case – JURIST – News

The United States Supreme Court added five cases to its roster on Thursday following its “long conference” on September 27.

Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for the Senate is a lawsuit filed by the Republican Senator from Texas challenging a federal law that restricts when and how a candidate for election can repay personal loans to his own campaigns. Cruz argues that the restrictions violate the First Amendment, while the FEC retorts that the law is necessary to protect against the apparent and actual corruption in return.

Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation is a procedural matter regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. The question is whether a federal court hearing a state law claim under the Act must apply the choice of law rules of the forum state or whether it can apply federal common law. The applicant in the case, David Cassirer, has taken the case to the high court because he is seeking to recover a painting by Camille Pissarro, which is now in a Spanish museum. Cassirer claims the painting was stolen from those close to him by the Nazis.

Boechler, PC v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue is another procedural case, this one asking whether the 30-day time limit to file a petition for review with the Tax Court following a notice of determination from the IRS is a requirement. jurisdictional or claim- treatment rule subject to a fair toll. In the first case, the Tax Court would not have the power to review late-filed applications, but in the second case, the time limit could be extended depending on the circumstances.

Concepcion v. United States involves the First Step Act of 2018, which grants federal district courts the power to punish offenders convicted of distributing crack in light of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. This law was intended to correct disparities in the matter. between those convicted of distributing crack against those convicted of distributing powdered cocaine. The question for the Court to decide is whether the district court, in deciding to impose a lighter sentence, should or can consider intermediate legal and factual developments.

Finally, in Shurtleff v. City of Boston, the Court will consider a question of religion in public places. A Christian group has filed a complaint against the city when the city refused to allow the group to raise a flag, which includes the image of a Latin cross, on a flag pole at the town hall, while the city regularly allows to many other groups to use the masts. The group claims the city’s denial violates their First Amendment rights.

The Court’s 2021-2022 term begins on October 4.

About Michael S. Montanez

Check Also

Russian indicted for long US propaganda campaign

How widespread is Russian propaganda in the United States? According to an unsealed indictment today …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.